The Careful Return of Sports Medicine Procedures in the United States During COVID-19: Comparison of Utilization, Patient Demographics, and Complications.

OBJECTIVES: Sports medicine procedures encompass some of the highest-volume elective surgeries performed annually. Elective surgery was suspended because of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) pandemic; therefore, the purpose was to compare temporal trends in procedural volume, patient demographics, and postoperative complications of elective sports medicine procedures in 2019 and 2020. METHODS: Using a multicenter, nationwide sample, a retrospective query of the 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was conducted for all patients undergoing common elective sports medicine procedures. Temporal trends in utilization, demographics, and 30-day complications were compared pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). Linear regression was used to evaluate changes in procedural volume over time. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was used. RESULTS: A total of 48,803 patients underwent elective surgery in 2019 (n = 27,883) and 2020 (n = 20,920), a 25.0% decline. Procedural utilization declined by 42.5% in 2020Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline in 2020Q3-Q4. The percentage decline in case volume from 2019 to 2020Q2 was greatest for meniscectomy (47.6%), rotator cuff repair (42.7%), labral repair (41.6%), biceps tenodesis (41.3%), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (38.5%). Total complication rates were similar in 2019 (1.31%) versus 2020 (1.51%; P = 0.072). The 30-day readmission (0.74% versus 0.67%; P = 0.374), reoperation (0.35% versus 0.35%; P = 0.963), and mortality (0.01% versus 0.01%; P = 0.657) rates were similar between calendar years. CONCLUSIONS: Sports medicine procedures declined during the second quarter of 2020. Despite pandemic restrictions, patients who did undergo surgery did not experience increased complications. The present study may be used by surgeons, hospitals, and subspecialty societies to support the careful utilization of elective surgery during COVID-19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prognostic study.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the USA: further evidence that outpatient arthroplasty is safe and effective.

PURPOSE: In response to COVID-19, elective surgeries including unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) decreased. We aimed to quantify and compare temporal trends in utilization and complications in the calendar year 2019 (pre-pandemic) to 2020 in the USA. METHODS: The 2019 to 2020 ACS-NSQIP database was queried for patients undergoing elective UKA. Patients prior to COVID-19 (2019 and 2020 Q1) were compared to those after (2020 Q2-Q4). Case volumes, patient demographics, complications, and lengths of stay (LOS) were compared between years. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare patient demographics. Linear regression was conducted to evaluate the change in case volumes. P values less than 0.05 were significant. RESULTS: In total, 3361 patients underwent UKA: 1880 in 2019 and 1481 in 2020. The number of outpatient UKAs increased (56.4% vs. 65.6%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019Q1 through 2020Q1 (p = 0.424). Case volumes fell by 60% in 2020Q2 compared with the average quarterly volume in 2019. Comparing 2019 to 2020, there was no significant difference in rates of total complications (2.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.843), minor complications (1.2% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.529), major complications (1.1% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.447), infection complications (1.0% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.652), wound complications (0.1% vs. 0.1%; p = 1.0), cardiac complications (0.0% vs. 0.1%; p = 0.111), pulmonary complications (0.1% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.473), hematology complications (0.1% vs. 0.1%; p = 1.0), renal complications (0.1% vs. 0.0%; p = 1.0), and Clavien-Dindo IV complications (0.1% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.177). CONCLUSION: UKA case volumes declined during the second quarter of 2020. A significant proportion of surgeries were transitioned outpatient, despite no change in complication rates.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty Utilization, Patient Comorbidity Burden, and Complications in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the highest volume elective procedures done nationwide. Elective surgery was suspended because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The utilization trends, comparison of patient demographics, and postoperative outcomes in 2020 have yet to be evaluated substantially. We compared temporal trends in procedural volume, patient demographics, and postoperative complications of elective TKA in 2019 and 2020. METHODS: Using a multicenter, nationwide representative sample, a retrospective query of the 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was conducted for patients undergoing elective TKA. Temporal trends in utilization, demographics, and length of stay were compared pre-COVID-19 (2019 to 2020Q1) with post-COVID-19 (2020Q2 to Q4). Postoperative outcomes were compared by calendar year (2019 versus 2020). Linear regression was used to evaluate changes in procedural volume over time. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was used. RESULTS: A total of 121,415 patients underwent elective TKA in 2019 (N = 72,002) and 2020 (N = 49,413), a 31.4% decline. The proportion of hospital-defined "outpatient" TKAs in 2020 was significantly greater than that in 2019 (41.5% versus 25.5%; P < 0.001). Elective TKA utilization declined by 65.1% in 2020Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline in 2020Q3 to Q4. The average length of stay was shorter in 2020 (1.56 versus 1.87 days; P < 0.001). The proportion of same-day discharge increased each quarter from 2019Q1 to Q4 (6.2% to 8.6%) to 2020Q1 to Q4 (8.7% to 17.1%). Total complication rates were similar in 2019 (4.84%) versus 2020 (4.75%); P = 0.430. The 30-day mortality (0.08% versus 0.07%; P = 0.858), revision surgery (1.0% versus 1.0%; P = 0.940), and readmission (2.8% versus 2.6%; P = 0.053) rates were no different between 2019 and 2020. CONCLUSION: Elective TKA declined during the second quarter of 2020. A large proportion of surgeries were transitioned to outpatient with rates of same-day discharge increasing over the study period, despite no change in complication, mortality, and readmission rates. Patient outcomes were not compromised despite pandemic restrictions for elective surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The combined effect of policy changes and the covid-19 pandemic on the same day discharge and complications following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis.

INTRODUCTION: As a result of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, elective surgeries, including total joint arthroplasty (TJA), were suspended nationwide. Concurrent removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Medicare inpatient-only list posed challenges to the delivery of quality patient care with low payor cost. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare temporal trends in patient demographics, case volumes, length of stay, and complications following elective THA in the years 2019 to 2020 in the United States. METHODS: The 2019 to 2020 ACS-NSQIP database was queried for elective THA patients. Patients Pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) were compared with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). THA utilization, demographics, 30-day complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between years. Linear regression evaluated changes in case volumes over time with significance threshold of P < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 77,797 patients underwent elective THA in 2019 (n = 43,667) and 2020 (n = 34,130), resulting in a 24.5% decline. Outpatient THA increased in 2020 (35.6%) vs. 2019 (5.7%) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019Q1 through 2019Q4 (P = 0.984). Elective THA volumes declined by 68.8% in 2020Q2, returned to pre-pandemic baseline in 2020Q3, before leveling off at 81.5% of baseline in Q4. Average LOS was significantly shorter in 2020 (1.55 days) vs. 2019 (1.78 days) (P < 0.001) and the proportion of same day discharge (SDD) increased quarterly from 2019 to 2020. There was no significant difference in the total complication rates in 2019 (6.6%) vs. 2020 (6.6%) (P = 0.831). DISCUSSION: Elective THA precipitously declined during the second quarter of 2020. The combined effect of policy changes and the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a seven-fold increase in the number of surgeries performed in the outpatient setting in 2020. Rates of SDD doubled over the study period, despite no change in complication rates.

The resiliency of elective total shoulder arthroplasty case volumes in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide temporal trends analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is one of the fastest growing procedures in terms of volume performed in hospitals in the United States. In 2020, elective surgery was suspended nationwide as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, and the use trends in the wake of the pandemic have yet to be evaluated substantially. Nationwide case volume reduction for TSA is unknown; therefore, the aim of this study is to compare patient demographics, complications, and temporal trends in case volume of elective TSA in the calendar year 2019 (prepandemic) to 2020 in the United States. METHODS: Using a multicenter, nationwide representative sample from 2019 to 2020, a retrospective query was conducted for all patients undergoing elective TSA. Patients undergoing surgery pre-COVID (2019 and 2020 Q1) were compared to those during COVID (2020 Q2-Q4). Temporal trends in case volumes were compared between time frames. TSA use, patient demographics, complications, and length of stay were compared between years. Linear regression was used to evaluate for changes in the case volume over the study period. A statistical significance threshold of P <.05 was used. RESULTS: In total, 9667 patients underwent elective TSA in 2019 (n = 5342) and 2020 (n = 4325). The proportion of patients who underwent outpatient TSA in 2020 was significantly greater than the year prior (20.6% vs. 13.9%; P < .001). Overall, elective TSA case volume declined by 19.0% from 2019 to 2020. There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019 Q1 (n = 1401) through 2020 Q1 (n = 1296) (P = .216). However, elective TSA volumes declined by 54.6% in 2020 Q2. Elective TSA case volumes recovered to prepandemic baseline in 2020 Q3 and 2020 Q4. The average length of stay was comparable in 2020 vs. 2019 (1.29 vs. 1.32 days; P = .371), with the proportion of same-day discharge increasing per quarter from 2019 to 2020 (from 11.8% to 26.8% of annual cases). There was no significant difference in the total complication rates in 2019 (4.6%) vs. 2020 (4.9%) (P = .441). CONCLUSION: Using a nationwide sample, elective TSA precipitously declined during the second quarter of 2020. Patient demographics of those undergoing elective TSA in 2020 were similar in comorbidity burden. A large proportion of surgeries were transitioned to the outpatient setting, with rates of same-day discharge doubling over the study period despite no change in overall complication rates.

How Did Coronavirus-19 Impact the Expenses for Medical Students Applying to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in 2020 to 2021?

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive specialties for residency applicants. For the 2021 residency match, the coronavirus-19 pandemic introduced complexity for programs and applicants because away rotations were limited and in-person interviews were cancelled. This may have changed the landscape in terms of expenses for candidates in important ways, but this topic has been insufficiently studied. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Given that in 2021, students did not attend away rotations and all interviews were held virtually, we asked (1) What were the financial savings associated with this change? (2) Was medical school geographic region associated with differences in expenses when applying to residency? METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 and 2021 Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency Dashboard database was performed. The data were derived from an online survey of a nationwide pool of applicants from 87% (123 of 141) of US allopathic medical schools upon conclusion of the match. The response percentage was 29% (521 of 1794). We believe this nationwide dataset represents the largest and most current data for this applicant group. Responses from applicants applying to orthopaedic surgery residency in the year before the COVID-19 pandemic application changes (2020) and during COVID-19 (2021) were queried and compared. After the orthopaedic surgery match, the database was evaluated for individual (application costs, away rotation expenses, and interview expenses) and total expenses for medical school seniors applying to orthopaedic surgery residency. Applicant characteristics were compared between application cycles. The 2020 to 2021 Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency Dashboard database had 521 responses (n = 263 in 2020 and n = 258 in 2021) from applicants applying to orthopaedic surgery residency. Demographic and applicant characteristics were comparable between application cycles. Median expenses are reported with percentile distributions and geographic comparisons. A Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine whether there were statistically significant differences in expenses between years and between medical school regions at a p value threshold of < 0.05. RESULTS: For all applicants, the median total expenses (USD 7250 versus USD 2250), application costs (USD 2250 versus USD 1750), away rotation expenses (USD 2750 versus USD 250), and interview expenses (USD 2250 versus USD 75) declined in 2021 compared with 2020 (all p < 0.001). The median total savings in expenses for all applicants in 2021 compared with 2020 was USD 5000. In 2021, median total expenses were lower in all geographic regions with the greatest savings from applicants in the West (USD 6000); in addition, the difference in median total expenses between the geographic region with the highest total expenses and the lowest total expenses was lower in the pandemic year than it was in the year prior (USD 1000 versus USD 1500; p < 0.001). In 2021, there were differences in total expenses between the Northeast (USD 1750), West (USD 1750), and Central (USD 2750) regions (p < 0.001). From 2020 to 2021, only application fees from Northeast applicants differed (USD 2250 versus USD 1250; p < 0.001). In 2020, interview expenses were not different between all regions (USD 2250 Northeast and West versus USD 2750 Central and South; p = 0.19); similarly in 2021, interview expenses were similar between all regions (USD 75 versus USD 75; p = 0.82). Finally, in 2020, Northeast (USD 3250) and Western (USD 3250) applicants spent more for away rotations than Southern (USD 2750) and Central (USD 2250) applicants (p = 0.01). In 2021, applicants from schools in the South (USD 250) and Central (USD 250) regions spent more than their counterparts (USD 0; p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: In the COVID-19 application cycle, the median expenditures of orthopaedic residency candidates were USD 5000 lower than they were in the previous year; the difference can be attributed to the use of virtual interviews and the lack of away rotations. There are geographic implications, with applicants from Western United States medical schools potentially saving the most. Despite the financial savings during the 2021 match, further study related to the long-term success of the current application process (both for applicants and programs) is needed. The recommendation in May 2020 by the AOA Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD) to limit the number of applications submitted by candidates with USMLE Step 1 scores greater than 235 did not result in any considerable decline in applications submitted or expenses. A better understanding of how differences in these expenses may influence our specialty's ability to attract socioeconomically diverse candidates would be important, and we need to explore perceived and actual financial obstacles to obtaining this diversity in the application process. Finally, avenues should be explored by program directors and chairpersons to reduce the expenses of the traditional application process while maintaining recruitment of top candidates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, economic analysis.